This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] ARM: Use different linker path for hardfloat ABI

On Tuesday 10 April 2012 00:16:34 Jeff Law wrote:
> On 04/09/2012 05:14 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > tbh, i thought the ldso discussion was more "we've been talking about
> > this for a long time, so let's just go with XXX" and then people moved
> > on to the next topic (which was defining exactly what "hard float abi"
> > meant wrt compiler flags).  further, it seemed like we had distro
> > representation there, but not mainline gcc people.
> Actually Mike, there was at least one mainline GCC person there.  Me.

my mistake.  i don't think we've met before, and that was a fairly busy time 
for me, so i probably missed things.  we should get a beer ;).

> Of course I was thrown into a discussion I knew nothing about

admittedly, that was the first time i've been in a linaro-related meeting 
before, and i hadn't been following linaro at all before (as the job i left 
before wasn't working on arm at all)

> goal of having a standardized path to discover which worked across
> distros seems like goodness to me.  Honestly, I don't see what all the
> resistance is about.

i think we have suggestions that would work for everyone ... but maybe this 
thread has gotten too big so we need to regroup with a summary

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]