This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Add OPTION_MASK_ISA_X86_64 and support TARGET_BI_ARCH == 2


On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Iain Sandoe <idsandoe@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi H.J.
>
>
> On 31 Mar 2012, at 20:24, Jack Howarth wrote:
>>
>>
>> ÂThe latest gcc-pr52784-2.patch patch also allows current gcc trunk to
>> bootstrap on i386-apple-darwin10.
>
>
> Despite the fact that bootstrap is restored, there remain problems with this
> patch and some more work is needed.
>
> (a) [trivial] the option 'mx32' is in i386.opt, which means it is exposed to
> all sub-targets, even if they don't support it.
>
> $ ./gcc/xgcc -Bgcc ../tests/hello.c -mx32 -o hc
> /var/folders/OW/OW-PGOtgHbKakssxFpJpkU++-0E/-Tmp-//ccIP9e4Z.s:10:bad
> register name `%rbp'
> /var/folders/OW/OW-PGOtgHbKakssxFpJpkU++-0E/-Tmp-//ccIP9e4Z.s:14:bad
> register name `%rsi'
> etc. etc.

It is useful for bootstrap and allows you check out what
X32 code looks like even if your OS doesn't support it.

> (b) [serious] the m64 ObjC multi-lib is broken on i?86-darwin* (and likely
> there are other more subtle effects).
>
> This is because the code in config/darwin.c that Joseph pointed out (earlier
> in this thread) is called for SUBSUBTARGET_OVERRIDE_OPTIONS.
>
> That code sets defaults for, and checks errors for, flags that apply to
> *-*-darwin* (and are needed for LTO as well as c-family).
>
> In the case of the ObjC ABI (fobjc-abi-version=) we need to default it to
> "2" @ m64 (and default it to 0 or 1 depending on the darwin version @ m32).
>
> I accept that some of this could possibly be done in driver-self-specs;
> however, we allow m32/m64 to be unspecified on the c/l and to default for
> the target. ÂI'm also not yet sure whether %:version-compare() would be
> applicable to fobjc-abi-version.
>
> Thus, the current trunk implementation is broken by your patch and we need
> to address that pending other solutions (I'm also very short of free time
> for Darwin right now - to experiment with the specs solution).

Please try this

diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
index c959113..69893ab 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
@@ -3109,14 +3109,6 @@ ix86_option_override_internal (bool main_args_p)
       sw = "attribute";
     }

-#ifdef SUBTARGET_OVERRIDE_OPTIONS
-  SUBTARGET_OVERRIDE_OPTIONS;
-#endif
-
-#ifdef SUBSUBTARGET_OVERRIDE_OPTIONS
-  SUBSUBTARGET_OVERRIDE_OPTIONS;
-#endif
-
   /* Turn off both OPTION_MASK_ABI_64 and OPTION_MASK_ABI_X32 if
      TARGET_64BIT_DEFAULT is true and TARGET_64BIT is false.  */
   if (TARGET_64BIT_DEFAULT && !TARGET_64BIT)
@@ -3157,6 +3149,14 @@ ix86_option_override_internal (bool main_args_p)
       ix86_isa_flags &= ~OPTION_MASK_ABI_X32;
     }

+#ifdef SUBTARGET_OVERRIDE_OPTIONS
+  SUBTARGET_OVERRIDE_OPTIONS;
+#endif
+
+#ifdef SUBSUBTARGET_OVERRIDE_OPTIONS
+  SUBSUBTARGET_OVERRIDE_OPTIONS;
+#endif
+
   /* -fPIC is the default for x86_64.  */
   if (TARGET_MACHO && TARGET_64BIT)
     flag_pic = 2;


> =--=
>
> It is possible that there is an options handling issue, (although I might
> also have misunderstood) viz:
>
> =========
> (current) i386.opt:
>
> ;; ISA support
>
>
> m32
> Target RejectNegative Negative(m64) Report InverseMask(ISA_64BIT)
> Var(ix86_isa_flags) Save
> Generate 32bit i386 code
>
> m64
> Target RejectNegative Negative(mx32) Report Mask(ABI_64) Var(ix86_isa_flags)
> Save
>
> Generate 64bit x86-64 code
>
> mx32
> Target RejectNegative Negative(m32) Report Mask(ABI_X32) Var(ix86_isa_flags)
> Save
> Generate 32bit x86-64 code
>
> =======
> from gccint.pdf (section 8.2):
>
> Negative(othername )
> The option will turn oï another option othername, which is the option name
> with the leading â-â removed. This chain action will propagate through the
> Negative property of the option to be turned oï.
> As a consequence, if you have a group of mutually-exclusive options, their
> Negative properties should form a circular chain. For example, if options
> â-a â, â-b â and â-c â are mutually exclusive, their respective Negative
> properties
> should be âNegative(b )â, âNegative(c )â and âNegative(a )â.
>
> ======
>
> I read this as "if the User specifies -a on the command line the inverse of
> -b *and* the inverse of -c will be applied".
>
> so that when -m64 is issued, the *inverse* of Mask(ABI_X32) should be
> applied and then the *inverse* of InverseMask(ISA_64BIT) - which would
> (correctly, for the case we're considering) set MASK_ISA_64BIT.
>
> However, in the example above this does NOT happen - if I set a breakpoint
> at the entry of x86_internal_override_options - ISA_64BIT ends up as 0 when
> -m64 is specified on the c/l for i?86-darwin*.
>
> The x86_isa_explicit stuff doesn't appear to get set either, although
> global_options_set.x_x86_isa... does, which I've used in the attached patch.
>
> so is this an options bug or misunderstanding on my part?
>

There is no problem here.  ISA_64BIT is turned on by ABI_64:

  else if (TARGET_LP64)
    {
      /* Always turn on OPTION_MASK_ISA_64BIT and turn off
         OPTION_MASK_ABI_X32 for TARGET_LP64.  */
      ix86_isa_flags |= OPTION_MASK_ISA_64BIT;
      ix86_isa_flags &= ~OPTION_MASK_ABI_X32;
    }



-- 
H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]