This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [C11-atomic] [patch] gimple atomic statements

From: Andrew MacLeod <amacleod at redhat dot com>
To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 07:58:52 -0400
Subject: Re: [C11-atomic] [patch] gimple atomic statements
References: <4F7B5218.6070609@redhat.com> <CAFiYyc23=L-9Qtn-vWuKa6BiSoRzHi=+SRmL-mMngdxS8xF9NA@mail.gmail.com> <4F7C4C75.4000304@redhat.com> <CAFiYyc22_xWdtRYd-VBp0xP0BJdhBRF3f16yoPukPowpfCkw6Q@mail.gmail.com> <4F7C6DC5.2010200@redhat.com> <CAFiYyc37UUQhoGxZfuw6yj_AiT7w53Wu0a6qvYcoSVMKpQFq0Q@mail.gmail.com>

On 04/05/2012 05:14 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:

Ok. I suppose having a GIMPLE_ATOMIC is fine then.

Thanks for all the feedback, I haven't really had to play in gimple land much lately. Some of those routines I guessed at what to do in order to get through initial compilation and your comments help clear those up too :-)

I will address everything next week since I doubt I will get to them before the long weekend arrives here.

Andrew

References:
- [C11-atomic] [patch] gimple atomic statements
  - From: Andrew MacLeod
- Re: [C11-atomic] [patch] gimple atomic statements
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [C11-atomic] [patch] gimple atomic statements
  - From: Andrew MacLeod
- Re: [C11-atomic] [patch] gimple atomic statements
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [C11-atomic] [patch] gimple atomic statements
  - From: Andrew MacLeod
- Re: [C11-atomic] [patch] gimple atomic statements
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]