This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: remove wrong code in immed_double_const


On Mar 26, 2012, at 4:57 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Mar 26, 2012, at 1:03 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> I think:
>> 
>> ...copies of the top bit.  Note however that values are neither inherently
>> signed nor inherently unsigned; where necessary, signedness is determined
>> by the rtl operation instead.
> 
> Sounds good to me, changed.

Oh, review caught one last problem:

> +, however values are neither signed nor unsigned.
> +All operations defined on such constants define the signededness.

This was edit cruft from the last rewording for the doc, the cruft has been removed.

Attachment: oi-trunk-3.diffs.txt
Description: Text document


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]