This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [C11-atomic] [patch] gimple atomic statements
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Richard Henderson <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 04/04/2012 09:46 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> If that is the only reason you can return two values by using a complex
>> or vector type (that would be only an IL implementation detail as far
>> as I can see).
>> We use that trick to get sincos () "sane" in our IL as well.
> That would work if the two values were of the same type, as they
> are with sincos. ?In the case of compare_exchange, they are not.
You can return an aggregate then (or adjust the IL so that they do have the
same type and only fix that up during expansion).