This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [google] Work around PR52796 by replacing empty packs with explicit overloads. (issue5971053)

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>
Cc: Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin at google dot com>, reply at codereview dot appspotmail dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 21:38:54 -0400
Subject: Re: [google] Work around PR52796 by replacing empty packs with explicit overloads. (issue5971053)
References: <20120331015523.883021E28AC@kishar.mtv.corp.google.com> <4F78848C.9050703@google.com>

On 04/01/2012 12:38 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:

I'm not sure it makes sense to propose it for gcc-4_6-branch. Jason/Ben,
any opinions on PR 52796 and what should we do for gcc-4_6-branch?

Fixed. :)

Jason

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [google] Work around PR52796 by replacing empty packs with explicit overloads. (issue5971053)
  - From: Paolo Carlini

References:
- Re: [google] Work around PR52796 by replacing empty packs with explicit overloads. (issue5971053)
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]