This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [ping 6] [patch] attribute to reverse bitfield allocations (is anyone even reading these?)
- From: Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>
- To: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 15:30:13 -0700
- Subject: Re: [ping 6] [patch] attribute to reverse bitfield allocations (is anyone even reading these?)
- References: <201103092245.p29MjZQ5018956@greed.delorie.com> <201107112052.p6BKqICk017576@greed.delorie.com> <201107212223.p6LMNE07001515@greed.delorie.com> <201108221736.p7MHaeqN025057@greed.delorie.com> <201201110556.q0B5uBV9028046@greed.delorie.com> <201201241939.q0OJdvHw005708@greed.delorie.com> <201202131943.q1DJh6ZK011131@greed.delorie.com> <201204021941.q32Jfwsq015053@greed.delorie.com>
On Apr 2, 2012, at 12:41 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
> Ping 6...
> It's now been over EIGHT MONTHS since I posted the patch, back in
> stage 1 for 4.7. Can someone please review and/or approve this before
> gcc 4.8's stage 1 is closed? This is needed as a first step for ABI
> compatibility for rx-elf.
Set up a cron job to ping once a day. :-) Did you ever dig up the Apple test cases from the APPLE LOCAL work I pointed you at earlier? They will be more comprehensive that any testing you've done, and, if you get them to all pass, the work should be closer to being complete. The feature needed a ton of testcases, a few didn't cut it.