This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [C++ RFC / Patch] Implementing "Deducing "noexcept" for destructors"

On 03/29/2012 03:06 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote: 
The exception specification on old_decl doesn't matter; we can drop
that test.

I seem to remember something going wrong with templates otherwise,
because implicitly_declare_fn has gcc_assert (!dependent_type_p (type));

We shouldn't be doing this for templates anyway, as in general we can't know what the implicitly declared function will look like.

Jason

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]