This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Propagate profile counts after switch case expansion (issue5896043)


Easwaran Raman <eraman@google.com> writes:

> Some more background on this patch: Right now, while the execution
> counts of different case labels of a switch statement are obtained
> during profile collection, they are not propagated to RTL. Instead,
> counts are regenerated at the RTL level using static heuristics that
> tend to weigh branches equally which can cause poor optimization of
> hot code. This patch ensures that the counts collected during profile
> collection are correctly propagated allowing hot code to be better
> optimized by RTL optimizations.  Patch tested on x86_64.

I think your patch doesn't use the probably to weight the decision 
tree for non tablejump, right? I looked at this some time ago,
but the patch always had problems.

-Andi

-- 
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]