This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Properly check mode for x86 call/jmp address

From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 11:22:27 +0100
Subject: Re: PATCH: Properly check mode for x86 call/jmp address
References: <CAMe9rOpD+bUmQQX=YgA8CH4jtHQikchWFVDErtkskjQ_v_AdBA@mail.gmail.com> <4F5669D2.8080805@redhat.com> <CAMe9rOqnM8r3WLXf70_r__+z_pgJtrs3YZ1y66djCHrESj-FTw@mail.gmail.com> <CAFULd4Z9wo0dyvUr5bey-yHM-597TQm7_1cvtE_j_yviajGG_A@mail.gmail.com> <CAFULd4bR4O0RnRnccDz4tSADgQpf2bkg0AUCj51Nfzra4caCJw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ah, I vaguely remember that indirect call/jmp is invalid on X32 for

This should read "... indirect call/jmp FROM MEMORY is invalid on X32
...". It looks I've had too much morning coffee already ;)

Uros.

References:
- PATCH: Properly check mode for x86 call/jmp address
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: PATCH: Properly check mode for x86 call/jmp address
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: PATCH: Properly check mode for x86 call/jmp address
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: PATCH: Properly check mode for x86 call/jmp address
  - From: Uros Bizjak
- Re: PATCH: Properly check mode for x86 call/jmp address
  - From: Uros Bizjak

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]