This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Fix PR52297
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Richard Guenther <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> >> Moving them to libitm/testsuite is an option, but that might be more
> >> difficult for the LTO case. I thought about adding
> >> dg-require-effective-target tm_runtime (to check for working
> >> -litm/libitm.spec) and dg-add-options tm_runtime to add the necessary
> >> -B/-L/-I options (and eventually setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH for runtime
> >> tests), but didn't yet get around to it.
> > I'm not so sure. All other target lib lto testcases are in the
> > respective target dir.
> Such as? I can't find any use of lto.exp or -flto in lib*/testsuite.
Hmm, I may indeed misremember (I thought of libgomp). Definitely
some LTO testcases use dg-additional-sources, and for out-of LTO
harness LTO testcases we have the 'lto' effective target.