This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Ignore hard register uses in DEBUG_INSNs for regs_ever_live (PR bootstrap/52397)


Il 29/02/2012 00:37, Jakub Jelinek ha scritto:
> Hi!
> 
> Bootstrap fails on ia64-linux with Ada currently, because we get
> a -fcompare-debug failure on one of the files, where a debug_insn
> is the only insn that references in5 hard register (which is live on
> entry of the first bb).  hard_regs_live_count array is only used to compute
> regs_ever_live, so I don't see why it should take into account DEBUG_INSN
> uses.  Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, tested
> on uint.ad* from the PR using ia64-linux cross, ok for trunk?
> 
> 2012-02-28  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
> 
> 	PR bootstrap/52397
> 	* df.h (struct df_d): Adjust comment that hard_regs_live_count
> 	doesn't count DEBUG_INSN refs.
> 	* df-scan.c (df_ref_create_structure): Don't set DF_HARD_REG_LIVE
> 	for DEBUG_INSN refs.
> 
> --- gcc/df.h.jj	2011-12-14 14:04:30.000000000 +0100
> +++ gcc/df.h	2012-02-28 18:21:07.834599257 +0100
> @@ -574,7 +574,7 @@ struct df_d
>       uses and defs as well as refs in eq notes are ignored.  If the
>       ref is a def, it cannot be a MAY_CLOBBER def.  If the ref is a
>       use, it cannot be the emim_reg_set or be the frame or arg pointer
> -     register.
> +     register.  Uses in debug insns are ignored.
>  
>       IT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE TO MANUALLY CHANGE THIS ARRAY.  This array
>       always reflects the actual number of refs in the insn stream that
> --- gcc/df-scan.c.jj	2011-08-28 13:20:27.609420371 +0200
> +++ gcc/df-scan.c	2012-02-28 21:43:49.341591773 +0100
> @@ -2794,8 +2794,9 @@ df_ref_create_structure (enum df_ref_cla
>    DF_REF_FLAGS_CLEAR (this_ref, DF_HARD_REG_LIVE);
>  
>    /* See if this ref needs to have DF_HARD_REG_LIVE bit set.  */
> -  if ((regno < FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER)
> -      && (!DF_REF_IS_ARTIFICIAL (this_ref)))
> +  if (regno < FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER
> +      && !DF_REF_IS_ARTIFICIAL (this_ref)
> +      && !DEBUG_INSN_P (DF_REF_INSN (this_ref)))
>      {
>        if (DF_REF_REG_DEF_P (this_ref))
>  	{
> 
> 	Jakub
> 

Ok.

For 4.8 I'm wondering whether we want a df_ref flag for "in a debug insn".

Paolo


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]