This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH, i386] RTM support

Hi guys,

I've played ".+6" and it seems to be working, although I'd rather
prefer "$0" much better, since it is not deal with insn+ops length.
Will prepare updated patch later today

K

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
>> BTW: Looking a bit more to the spec, we can simply write
>>
>> xbegin $0
>>
>> as the spec says that offset is relative to the _NEXT_ instruction
>
> Yes that's true. I'm not sure the .+6 even results in 0. Kirill?
>
> -Andi
>
> --
> ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]