This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH, i386] RTM support
I've played ".+6" and it seems to be working, although I'd rather
prefer "$0" much better, since it is not deal with insn+ops length.
Will prepare updated patch later today
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Andi Kleen <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> BTW: Looking a bit more to the spec, we can simply write
>> xbegin $0
>> as the spec says that offset is relative to the _NEXT_ instruction
> Yes that's true. I'm not sure the .+6 even results in 0. Kirill?
> email@example.com -- Speaking for myself only.