This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

[C++ Patch] PR 51612

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Cc: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 02:04:40 +0100
Subject: [C++ Patch] PR 51612

Hi,

thus, as explained by Jason in the audit trail, the reason why we are ICE-ing here and failing to provide satisfactory diagnostics is that we are not checking for virtual base classes, which are explicitly forbidden in C++11 for constexpr constructors.

Thus I'm simply doing the below, tested x86_64-linux.

Thanks,
Paolo.

PS: I was not 100% sure, thus I double checked that defaulted and deleted are handled elsewhere.

//////////////////////

Attachment: CL_51612
Description: Text document

Attachment: patch_51612
Description: Text document

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 51612
  - From: Jason Merrill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]