This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [google] Add support for delete operator that takes the size of the object as a parameter

From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>
Cc: Easwaran Raman <eraman at google dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Xinliang David Li <davidxl at google dot com>, jason at redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 14:17:13 +0100
Subject: Re: [google] Add support for delete operator that takes the size of the object as a parameter
References: <CAPK5YPbTBHTyTODjsJL4v4H=v4=zAktHVQ=vmJb8juFVb8ZOwQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAD_=9DRqkF9kDD-wNqkFTZV6z9dNpqHceNacDA4iteZhmsaqRA@mail.gmail.com>

On 12/12/2011 02:14 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:

On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 19:05, Easwaran Raman<eraman@google.com> wrote:

Bootstraps and no test regressions. OK for google/gcc-4_6 branch?
Any reason not to put this in google/main for future trunk inclusion.
Should this be backported to gcc-4_6-branch?

Note that backporting the patch as-is to 4_6-branch would be very wrong in terms of ABI (in mainline we already have a 3.4.17)

Paolo.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [google] Add support for delete operator that takes the size of the object as a parameter
  - From: Diego Novillo

References:
- [google] Add support for delete operator that takes the size of the object as a parameter
  - From: Easwaran Raman
- Re: [google] Add support for delete operator that takes the size of the object as a parameter
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]