This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Memset/memcpy patch
- From: Michael Zolotukhin <michael dot v dot zolotukhin at gmail dot com>
- To: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>
- Cc: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, izamyatin at gmail dot com
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 15:58:19 +0400
- Subject: Re: Memset/memcpy patch
- References: <20111117211057.GE30593@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20111117212335.GF30593@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20111118022326.GA1969@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <CANtU078kGiRW=7u2E=_kAVeK0WJQXXKUru_QD6PfiLjf_-8DdQ@mail.gmail.com> <20111118141851.GA8612@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <CAMe9rOofAmsXPGk9GrSSubAR9kPs1Uv=VCiu0=yhA3Z2_Mnekg@mail.gmail.com> <20111119013804.GC20336@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <CANtU078S6a=qQ7-U2K1wZce5bOh+QQBZOYGxMm7iL4p7rqDfLw@mail.gmail.com> <CANtU07-DLxO3jy9eukOFDWqqH8g9A18hXPV7KMXAMkBVFKrHjQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAMe9rOqh_iqY4Ppe1K+3n6o_kZw_eivVH0xRTtiGh7VaQ9Lzow@mail.gmail.com> <20111126051811.GA18849@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <CANtU07-1_g38hAJCc0cXJuO6+2-p00vV0DVfaBdp9jGXokhogQ@mail.gmail.com>
Any update?
On 5 December 2011 15:14, Michael Zolotukhin
<michael.v.zolotukhin@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Jan,
> I debugged the changes, and I think I've hunted down all the bugs.
> I slightly refactored the code - now all new SSE-related code is more
> localized. Also, I fixed some alignment issues.
> Please find the new patch in the attachment (it's made against rev
> 181709) - is it ok for trunk?
>
> Bootstrap and 'make check' passed on Atom and Corei7 (32,64 bits). I
> also checked specs2000, eembc1_1 and eembc2_0 on Atom.
>
> On 26 November 2011 09:18, Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Michael Zolotukhin
>>> <michael.v.zolotukhin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > I found and fixed another problem in the latest memcpy/memest changes
>>> > - with this fix all the failing tests mentioned in #51134 started
>>> > passing. Bootstraps are also ok.
>>> > Though I still see fails in 32-bit make check, so probably, it'd be
>>> > better to revert the changes till these fails are fixed.
>>> >
>>>
>>> I will revert it for now.
>>
>> OK. ?I guess I can break out the simple fixes and commit them for 4.7 and we
>> could revisit this for next stage1. Probably not by adding all the features
>> together, but extending prologues/epilogues first and adding SSE loops with
>> the new alignment logic next.
>>
>> Honza
>>>
>>> --
>>> H.J.
>
>
>
> --
> ---
> Best regards,
> Michael V. Zolotukhin,
> Software Engineer
> Intel Corporation.
--
---
Best regards,
Michael V. Zolotukhin,
Software Engineer
Intel Corporation.