This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: {patch implicit-zee.c]: Fix printf-formatter use for long-long type for windows native targets.


On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Kai Tietz <ktietz70@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this patch fixes for windows native target print-formatter used about
> long-long type.
>
> ChangeLog
>
> 2011-12-09 ?Kai Tietz ?<ktietz@redhat.com>
>
> ? ? ? ?* implicit-zee.c (find_and_remove_ze): Use
> ? ? ? ?HOST_WIDEST_INT_PRINT_DEC instead of %lld.
>
> Tested for i686-w64-mingw32, x86_64-w64-mingw32, and
> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. ?Ok for apply?

Just change num_realized and num_ze_opportunities to
type long.

Richard.

> Kai
>
> Index: implicit-zee.c
> ===================================================================
> --- implicit-zee.c ? ? ?(revision 182092)
> +++ implicit-zee.c ? ? ?(working copy)
> @@ -944,10 +944,12 @@
> ? VEC_free (rtx, heap, zeinsn_del_list);
>
> ? if (dump_file && num_ze_opportunities > 0)
> - ? ?fprintf (dump_file, "\n %s : num_zee_opportunities = %lld "
> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?"num_realized = %lld \n",
> + ? ?fprintf (dump_file, "\n %s : num_zee_opportunities = "
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? HOST_WIDEST_INT_PRINT_DEC
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?" num_realized = " HOST_WIDEST_INT_PRINT_DEC "\n",
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? current_function_name (),
> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?num_ze_opportunities, num_realized);
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?(HOST_WIDEST_INT) num_ze_opportunities,
> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?(HOST_WIDEST_INT) num_realized);
>
> ? df_finish_pass (false);
> ? return 0;


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]