This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Update to Fortran "invoke" documentation about the features -finit-<type> *really* provides.
- From: Toon Moene <toon at moene dot org>
- To: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
- Cc: gfortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 19:58:09 +0100
- Subject: Re: Update to Fortran "invoke" documentation about the features -finit-<type> *really* provides.
- References: <4EDD0BC7.4090500@moene.org> <20111206193202.GA35879@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
On 12/06/2011 08:32 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 07:21:59PM +0100, Toon Moene wrote:
2011-12-05 Toon Moene<toon@moene.org>
PR/51310
invoke.texi: Itemize the cases for which -finit-<type> doesn't
work.
OK for trunk ? (and perhaps later for the 4.6 branch ?
Looks good to me. You can apply it to the 4.6 branch
if you have time.
And then .... shortly before applying it, I realized that the proper
documentation of the limitations might be dependent on the
-fno-automatic, -fstack-arrays and -fmax-stack-var-size=n compiler flags
used.
So I'll come back tomorrow with version 2.0 of this patch, after
checking out all of the above (the documentation of 4.6 and 4.7 will be
different if using -fstack-arrays makes a difference, because that
option only exists in 4.7).
--
Toon Moene - e-mail: toon@moene.org - phone: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
At home: http://moene.org/~toon/; weather: http://moene.org/~hirlam/
Progress of GNU Fortran: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortran#news