This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Ping Re: Fix doloop bug with maximum-length loops

From: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr, rdsandiford at googlemail dot com
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 11:00:35 +0100
Subject: Re: Ping Re: Fix doloop bug with maximum-length loops
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1111251425460.16504@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1112020207450.1685@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <CA+=Sn1nKU9j=EEz4H9poHCGyxq8HG0y2SQbt7364dr+7Avo-qg@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 3:28 AM, Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Joseph S. Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>> Ping. ?This patch
>> <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg02405.html> is pending
>> review.
>>
>
> From my point of view, reverting my patch is fine as the testcase
> which I was trying to optimized was not even optimized on the trunk
> after this patch anyways.

Thus, it's ok.

Thanks,
Richard.

> Thanks,
> Andrew Pinski

References:
- Ping Re: Fix doloop bug with maximum-length loops
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: Ping Re: Fix doloop bug with maximum-length loops
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]