This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [Patch, libfortran, 3/3] Update file position lazily


On Tuesday 18 October 2011 17:11:24 Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> Also, I think I've found a small standards conformance bug. From F2008
> (N1830) 9.10.2.23 (page 256): "... ASIS if the connection was opened
> without changing its position." and "If the ïle has been repositioned
> since the connection, the scalar-default-char-variable
> is assigned a processor-dependent value, which shall not be REWIND
> unless the ïle is positioned at its initial
> point and shall not be APPEND unless the ïle is positioned so that its
> endïle record is the next record or at its
> terminal point if it has no endïle record.
> "
> 
> If my understanding of the above is correct, returning ASIS is
> incorrent unless the position is unchanged since the OPEN statement.
> Currently we return ASIS by default if it's neither REWIND nor APPEND.
> So the patch changes the implementation to return the
> processor-dependent value UNSPECIFIED in this case.
> 
If my reading is correct, returning ASIS is as valid as returning UNSPECIFIED 
("processor-dependent"). I have a preference for UNSPECIFIED and see your 
patch as OK, but shouldn't it be avoided if it breaks backwards compatibility?

I'm also afraid of testsuite changes of the following kind.
Was there no reason for the "-std=legacy"?

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/inquire_5.f90 
b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/inquire_5.f90
index fe107a1..064f96d 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/inquire_5.f90
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/inquire_5.f90
@@ -1,11 +1,10 @@
 ! { dg-do run { target fd_truncate } }
-! { dg-options "-std=legacy" }
 !

Mikael


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]