This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC PATCH] update to libtool-2.4.2 and regenerate


On 2011.10.28 at 00:41 +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> 
> > By popular demand, I've prepared a patch that updates the in-tree
> > libtool to version 2.4.2. It is needed for lto-bootstrap with
> > -fno-fat-lto-objects and FreeBSD10.x versions. 
> > It's a pretty big update as you can see by the following diffstat. I
> > cannot attach the patch even as a gzip file, because of its size:
> > 
> >  417745 Oct 28 00:47 0001-update-to-libtool-2.4.2-and-regenerate.patch.gz
> > 
> > Bootstrapped on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. 
> > 
> > Comments? Stage 1 will end soon and it would be nice to get this in.
> 
> What about the issues with libtool's notion of sysroots, as mentioned in 
> <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg02037.html> - have those 
> been resolved, and if so, how?  And what about the directories only 
> present in the src repository that will also need updating for such a 
> toplevel change?

Oops, you're right, libtools "with_sysroot" still clashes with gcc's
notion. But that should be easily fixable by just reverting one commit
(3334f7ed5851ef1) in libtool.
I'm afraid I don't understand your second question. Can you elaborate on
that?
And BTW my patch was just meant to get the ball rolling, not necessary
as the final solution.

-- 
Markus


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]