Re: [C++ Patch / RFC] PR 50864

[Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>]

On 10/26/2011 10:30 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Hi,
> > At a glance, it looks too early; it's valid to have 
> > namespace-qualified names after ->.
> >
> > namespace A
> > {
> >   struct B
> >   {
> >     int i;
> >   };
> > };
> >
> > A::B* b;
> > int i = b->A::B::i;
> I was also trying to construct such kind of example myself... but my 
> patch does not regress on the testcase you wrote down. I can tell you 
> exactly why, if you like..
We have that parser->scope is a RECORD_TYPE and postfix_expression is an 
INDIRECT_REF.

Paolo.