This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Bootstrap failure in tree-object-size.c due to -Wnarrowing (was: [C++ Patch] PR 50810)

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
To: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 22:45:07 +0200
Subject: Re: Bootstrap failure in tree-object-size.c due to -Wnarrowing (was: [C++ Patch] PR 50810)
References: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1110232129320.3090@gerinyyl.fvgr> <201110232225.07949.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <4EA47B66.8030707@oracle.com>

> Anyway, the below appears to work for me. Eric shall I commit it?

I have other errors for config/i386/i386.c on my x86-64 machine.  But are we 
sure that we want to warn on

static unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT unknown[4] = { -1, -1, 0, 0 };

with -Wall?  This seems overly picky to me.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bootstrap failure in tree-object-size.c due to -Wnarrowing (was: [C++ Patch] PR 50810)
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

References:
- Bootstrap failure in tree-object-size.c due to -Wnarrowing (was: [C++ Patch] PR 50810)
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer
- Re: Bootstrap failure in tree-object-size.c due to -Wnarrowing (was: [C++ Patch] PR 50810)
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: Bootstrap failure in tree-object-size.c due to -Wnarrowing (was: [C++ Patch] PR 50810)
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]