This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] C6X unwinding/exception handling

From: Bernd Schmidt <bernds at codesourcery dot com>
To: Nicola Pero <nicola dot pero at meta-innovation dot com>
Cc: Paul Brook <paul at codesourcery dot com>, Matthias Klose <doko at ubuntu dot com>, Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, GCC Java <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:29:00 +0200
Subject: Re: [patch] C6X unwinding/exception handling
References: <201108041531.58790.paul@codesourcery.com> <201110101323.00966.paul@codesourcery.com> <4E9C0B03.7070002@ubuntu.com> <201110171449.26890.paul@codesourcery.com> <1318860655.826721257@www2.webmail.us>

On 10/17/11 16:10, Nicola Pero wrote:
>>> I checked the attached patch, test results at
>>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-10/msg01377.html
>>>
>>> which are the same as with my suggested patch.
>>>
>>> Ok for the trunk?
>>
>> I probably don't have authority to approve this, but looks OK to me.
> 
> The libobjc bits are Ok for trunk.

This is just making sure libjava/libobjc match libsupc++, correct? OK if
Andrew doesn't object in the next day or so.


Bernd

References:
- Re: [patch] C6X unwinding/exception handling
  - From: Paul Brook
- Re: [patch] C6X unwinding/exception handling
  - From: Matthias Klose
- Re: [patch] C6X unwinding/exception handling
  - From: Paul Brook
- Re: [patch] C6X unwinding/exception handling
  - From: Nicola Pero

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]