This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PATCH: PR rtl-optimization/50696: [x32] Unnecessary lea

> The answer to H.J.'s "Why do we do it for MEM then?" is simply
> "because no one ever thought about not doing it" 

No, that's false.  The same expand_compound_operation / make_compound_operation
pair is present in the MEM case as in the SET case.  It's just that
there's some bug here that's noticable in not making proper MEMs that
doesn't show up in the SET case because of the way the insns are structured.
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]