This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Modify gcc for use with gdb (issue5132047)

From: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
Cc: Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>, Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Lawrence Crowl <crowl at google dot com>, reply at codereview dot appspotmail dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 09:45:59 -0600
Subject: Re: Modify gcc for use with gdb (issue5132047)
References: <20110926220500.9254022266A@jade.mtv.corp.google.com> <20110927071447.GJ2687@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> <CAFiYyc1F+qt8c4XTBn=Jp2WCdOLppkWaPahnmxUfd97K43v7UA@mail.gmail.com> <CAFiYyc14=_KNGBqm9-6C3ZMCLjPmP1UDzbmZOsPLFpi20=UEpA@mail.gmail.com> <4E8C5910.8020503@google.com> <DBDF1E7C-CF28-4ED6-9C12-D024787F48D5@comcast.net> <CAD_=9DQR0BeTRpmVLrgZLeCV6hRLEDGZJQ7M8OR0wP0Uyct55w@mail.gmail.com> <CAFiYyc2RsQWYNoi25+-wm4BTry3iNexKU=v2V0zZX4dNYnMTsQ@mail.gmail.com> <0628F12B-B5E1-404A-93D3-FC5059CB2A56@comcast.net> <4E8DF91A.5080300@redhat.com> <m38vowgbor.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/07/11 07:42, Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>>> "Jeff" == Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> Jeff> Presumably it hasn't been included because not all gdb's 
> understand Jeff> those bits and we typically don't build with -g3.
> 
> GCC is pretty much the perfect candidate for a -g3 build.  All 
> those macros...
> 
> The needed gdb changes have been in since right around when I added
> that patch to the incremental branch.  Anybody with a > 3 year old
> gdb should upgrade :-)
Hard to argue with that :-)  Gone are the days when I'd build a binary
tool of some sort and use it for many years thereafter.  I doubt
there's any binary on my boxes older than a year...

jeff
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOjx63AAoJEBRtltQi2kC7fXoH/13uE6l2klTOFPrAKbTszo5s
0fxtmLD9NQWyeOFuGL4P9O9J6rChdulFvY9oNlWUrJIwF7WTOp4FjqNZnhvzoIT8
zEqoT8yVO7pNS7KMyRbxJxz5iEx8pX0YW2O2Rl/qZGy/hFKatqaOgz/RuBZy4lg2
NpiKWULKRsc66FxPKhCPMqtSd338XOhC0S67D2GuK1qD93SFDEyoQbaViieMlmoo
qr5oFn1052byWd3J1cPbu5vv76YLnzPEmBybm0k/ZaoGFC/JidDghQvR9uHtBbbl
LLsFIej62rzCLWZTfbgaiAfKZv79msjhZIrhv8T9iSAolUG4KDvLCvP8SbUg6XI=
=KKKR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- Re: Modify gcc for use with gdb (issue5132047)
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: Modify gcc for use with gdb (issue5132047)
  - From: Mike Stump
- Re: Modify gcc for use with gdb (issue5132047)
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: Modify gcc for use with gdb (issue5132047)
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: Modify gcc for use with gdb (issue5132047)
  - From: Mike Stump
- Re: Modify gcc for use with gdb (issue5132047)
  - From: Jeff Law
- Re: Modify gcc for use with gdb (issue5132047)
  - From: Tom Tromey

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]