This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix stack red zone bug (PR38644)

From: Richard Sandiford <richard dot sandiford at linaro dot org>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
Cc: Jiangning Liu <jiangning dot liu at arm dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:22:14 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix stack red zone bug (PR38644)
References: <4e80536c.4a50ec0a.28da.4606SMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> <CA+=Sn1k1orj1tecmwk82B-r0CrqyF66roYTmG7rOcB3gVTAR6g@mail.gmail.com> <4e8134e6.4fc7e30a.72c4.52e0SMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> <CA+=Sn1mbYc_E7hp56-pXmRiDAFVhGhdCJSR4+u23hmxL2RnBpw@mail.gmail.com>

Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Jiangning Liu <jiangning.liu@arm.com> wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, for this bug, I donât see your valuable comments previously in either bug zilla and the [RFC] I sent out long time ago in gcc mail list. What I see is a bunch of people agreed this problem should be fixed in middle end.
>
> The only person I see that agrees this problem should be fixed in the
> middle-end is Richard S.  Everyone else seems like is saying it should
> be fixed in the back-end.

<paranoia>Did you mean Richard E?</paranoia>

Richard

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Fix stack red zone bug (PR38644)
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: [PATCH] Fix stack red zone bug (PR38644)
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]