This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Distribute inliner's size_time data across entries with similar predicates

From: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>
To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>, Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim at codesourcery dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 23:48:31 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Distribute inliner's size_time data across entries with similar predicates
References: <EAA3885D-F05A-4261-823B-3CFDFE139E81@codesourcery.com> <CAFiYyc2K-6iV48GihxSWqiGKr8n5kr9+jMwLuxxpT0GBOpxTyA@mail.gmail.com> <20110925102124.GE23405@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <CAFiYyc2rVhsFeQecz08X_63U5RTjVMgLDuq0VqKFmB+-QNVWEQ@mail.gmail.com>

> 
> Hm, what do we do for
> 
>  if (op0 > 10)
>    if (op1 > 10)
>      some code
> 
> ?  Do we make sure to only register one predicate with op0 > 10 && op1 > 10?

Yes, we end up with predicate (op0 > 10) && (op1 > 10). That is until we hit of
maximum limit of clauses in a single predicate. Then we just give up and start
dropping more of && clauses.

Honza

References:
- [PATCH] Distribute inliner's size_time data across entries with similar predicates
  - From: Maxim Kuvyrkov
- Re: [PATCH] Distribute inliner's size_time data across entries with similar predicates
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [PATCH] Distribute inliner's size_time data across entries with similar predicates
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: [PATCH] Distribute inliner's size_time data across entries with similar predicates
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]