This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [C++ Patch] PR 50309

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
Cc: "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:41:50 -0400
Subject: Re: [C++ Patch] PR 50309
References: <4E674980.8080006@oracle.com>

On 09/07/2011 06:37 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:

I have the below simple patch to avoid the ICE after error. Tested
x86_64-linux. Is it Ok? In case, if it applies as-is, 4_6-branch too?

I think this is a recoverable error; if the exception-specification is ill-formed, let's pretend there wasn't one rather than discard the whole declaration.

Jason

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 50309
  - From: Paolo Carlini

References:
- [C++ Patch] PR 50309
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]