This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: [Patch, testsuite] Skip case ipa-sra-2.c for strict_align target.
- From: "Terry Guo" <terry dot guo at arm dot com>
- To: "'Martin Jambor'" <mjambor at suse dot cz>, "Richard Guenther" <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- Cc: <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <ro at cebitec dot uni-bielefeld dot de>, <mikestump at comcast dot net>
- Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 20:17:38 +0800
- Subject: RE: [Patch, testsuite] Skip case ipa-sra-2.c for strict_align target.
- References: <4e6721bf.ca23440a.52e6.ffffb61dSMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> <CAFiYyc3eSk7Ku4SN5uBMWU+ubRPKpd370xn6k--mKYqjUMY0PQ@mail.gmail.com> <20110907115522.GA22329@virgil.arch.suse.de>
Hello,
> >
> > Hm, the testcase looks like it should actually pass even for strict-
> align
> > targets. Martin?
> >
>
> Well, tree_non_mode_aligned_mem_p clearly does not really work very
> well and needs a more-or-less reimplementation, there has been a
> discussion about this already in August (and you even had a
> suggestion):
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-08/msg00931.html
>
> This has been only slowly moving towards the top of my TODO list but I
> am aware of it and at the moment it is almost there, I should be
> looking at this issue pretty soon.
>
> The testcase certainly should pass also on strict alignment
> architectures and I'd prefer if it stayed enabled for them.
>
> Martin
>
Sorry for missing that mail thread. After read it, I agree with you guys. Let us keep this case for strict alignment architecture. Hope the improvement can be done soon. I also have a strong interest on checking alignment. Thanks very much.
Best regards,
Terry