This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [Patch, Ada, Darwin] Fix bootstrap issue on Darwin8.


On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 08:26:49PM +0100, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> Hi Arno,
>
> On 5 Sep 2011, at 20:04, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
>
>>> Darwin8 does not have _SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN defined.
>>
>> Is Darwin8 still active/supported?
>
> it works - and I test from time to time.
> .. feedback from fink in the form of bug reports suggests that it is  
> still being used in the wild too.

FYI, fink has moved darwin8 package support into a 10.4-EOL tree and developers
are no longer obligated to insure that fink packages build under darwin8.
Basically almost all of the fink developers just wish darwin8 would go away.
           Jack

>
> In fact, the tortuous route I used to get to a working PPC ADA bootstrap 
> was via a native-X darwin 8 compiler built on linux ;-)
> (Now I know the problem with the PPC bootstrap it's easier to do a  
> native X from i686-darwin, but I was debugging).
>
> ----
>
> The policy we have adopted is not to break earlier Darwin if possible -
> (bearing in mind that Darwin is volunteer-supported these days and we  
> have scant resources).
>
> However, FWIW, It is possible to build 4.6 even on Darwin 7 with some  
> fiddling (odcctools) ...
>
> [ However, I'm not going to nail my colors to the mast over this one ;-) 
> ]
>
>> Not as submitted, you haven't provided a suitable changelog for  
>> review.
>
> oops... apologies (and for the long lines in the other change logs)
> ... shouldn't type them directly into the mailer I suppose.
>
> ada:
> 	
> 	* adaint.c (__gnat_number_of_cpus): Don't try to check
> 	_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN for early versions of Darwin.
>
>> Also, when you repost your patch, can you please send a single version 
>> of
>> the patch (either inline or as an attachment)? TIA.
>
> The reason for duplication was that some people prefer one and some the 
> other ..
> .. plus mailers sometimes mangle in-line patches;
>
> OK for trunk/4.6?
> Iain
>

> Index: gcc/ada/adaint.c
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/ada/adaint.c	(revision 178554)
> +++ gcc/ada/adaint.c	(working copy)
> @@ -2460,7 +2460,10 @@ __gnat_number_of_cpus (void)
>    int cores = 1;
>  
>  #if defined (linux) || defined (sun) || defined (AIX) \
> -    || (defined (__alpha__)  && defined (_osf_)) || defined (__APPLE__)
> +    || (defined (__alpha__)  && defined (_osf_)) \
> +    || (defined (__APPLE__) \
> +        && defined (__ENVIRONMENT_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED__) \
> +        && __ENVIRONMENT_MAC_OS_X_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED__ >= 1050)
>    cores = (int) sysconf (_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN);
>  
>  #elif (defined (__mips) && defined (__sgi))

>
>
>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]