This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PING: PATCH [4/n]: Prepare x32: Permute the conversion and addition if one operand is a constant

From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
To: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 11:31:22 +0200
Subject: Re: PING: PATCH [4/n]: Prepare x32: Permute the conversion and addition if one operand is a constant
References: <CAFULd4aN7Q6UYH3Zn5SArO-xsZzz+eGr2OqEvD2Qpyo47vCpFw@mail.gmail.com>

On 07/28/2011 11:30 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:

>  convert_memory_address_addr_space has a special PLUS/MULT case for
>  POINTERS_EXTEND_UNSIGNED<  0. ?It turns out that it is also needed
>  for all Pmode != ptr_mode cases. ?OK for trunk?
>  2011-06-11 ?H.J. Lu ?<hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
>
>  ? ? ? ?PR middle-end/47727
>  ? ? ? ?* explow.c (convert_memory_address_addr_space): Permute the
>  ? ? ? ?conversion and addition if one operand is a constant.

Do we still need this patch? With recent target changes the testcase
from PR can be compiled without problems with a gcc from an unpatched
trunk.

Given the communication difficulties, I hope not...

Paolo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PING: PATCH [4/n]: Prepare x32: Permute the conversion and addition if one operand is a constant
  - From: H.J. Lu

References:
- Re: PING: PATCH [4/n]: Prepare x32: Permute the conversion and addition if one operand is a constant
  - From: Uros Bizjak

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]