This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Ping: The TI C6X port
- From: Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>
- To: Bernd Schmidt <bernds at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 08:57:51 -0700
- Subject: Re: Ping: The TI C6X port
- References: <4DC956D0.3040306@codesourcery.com> <4DE36DA3.5000007@codesourcery.com> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1106061450340.3492@gerinyyl.fvgr> <4E1ACDE0.9040806@codesourcery.com>
On Jul 11, 2011, at 3:18 AM, Bernd Schmidt <bernds@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On 06/06/11 14:53, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>> not a direct approval for any of the outstanding patches, but I am happy
>> to report that the steering committee is appointing you maintainer of the
>> C6X port.
>>
>> Please go ahead and add yourself to the MAINTAINERS file as part of the
>> patch that actually adds the port (10/11 if I recall correctly).
>
> Internally, the question came up whether that means I can just commit
> the port once the preliminary patches are approved (which I think is
> now). Opinions?
My take, you need approval for everything outside your area, once you have that, and that work is checked in, then, you can check in all the target bits, self approving those bits, if they meet your standard. Your free to reject them as well. ;-).