This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Address lowering [1/3] Main patch

From: Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de>
To: "William J. Schmidt" <wschmidt at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>
Cc: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, bergner at vnet dot ibm dot com
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 16:24:17 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Address lowering [1/3] Main patch
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1107041713120.17483@wotan.suse.de> <1309874727.5402.38.camel@oc2474580526.ibm.com>

Hi,

On Tue, 5 Jul 2011, William J. Schmidt wrote:

> Hm, I didn't think it was (currently) possible for a gimple statement to 
> have a mem-ref on both RHS and LHS.  Is that incorrect?  This is easily 
> changed if so, or if the possibility should be left open for the future.

Think aggregate copies:

void bla (struct S *d, struct S *s) { *d = *s; }


Ciao,
Michael.

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Address lowering [1/3] Main patch
  - From: Michael Matz
- Re: [PATCH] Address lowering [1/3] Main patch
  - From: William J. Schmidt

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]