This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH,Fortran] Handle 'q' exponent-letter in real-literal-constant


On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:54:37PM +0200, Mikael Morin wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 April 2011 01:06:26 Steve Kargl wrote:
> > 
> > It's an 'if -- else if' construct.  If gfc_notify_std == FAILURE, then
> > the error message is issues and the function returns.   If it is TRUE,
> > then there should be no messages and else if() is tested.
> My concern is that gfc_notify_std seems to return SUCCESS on warnings (I can't 
> test right now as make has decided to rebuild the whole middle-end :-(). Then, 
> I expect double warnings with -pedantic -Wreal-q-constant as -pedantic is a 
> (the only one ?) case outputing warnings for GNU extensions.
> 
> Mikael

laptop:kargl[220] gfc4x -pedantic -Wreal-q-constant -o z ui.f90
ui.f90:3.12:

   q = 1.23q45
            1
Warning: Extension: exponent-letter 'q' in real-literal-constant at (1)
laptop:kargl[221] gfc4x -pedantic -o z ui.f90
ui.f90:3.12:

   q = 1.23q45
            1
Warning: Extension: exponent-letter 'q' in real-literal-constant at (1)
laptop:kargl[222] gfc4x -Wreal-q-constant -o z ui.f90
ui.f90:3.12:

   q = 1.23q45
            1
Warning: Extension: exponent-letter 'q' in real-literal-constant at (1)

PS: People should not use -pedantic, anyway.  It doesn't do what
people think it does.

-- 
Steve


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]