This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH PING] c++-specific bits of tree-slimming patches
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:59:21AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 04/21/2011 10:55 PM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:49:05PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>> Hunh. How does that work? They fill in CASE_LABEL later? Can that be
>>> changed?
>>
>> Yeah, tree-eh.c:lower_try_finally_switch. I don't know how easy it is
>> to fix; it certainly looks non-trivial.
>
> Well, I tried adjusting it and regression testing seems fine so far. I
> can't think what the comment would be talking about with pointers not
> providing a stable order; I don't see anything that would rely on
> that.
Based on discussion downthread, I plan to commit something like your
patch (I think `label' is unused after this, so requires trivial
changes) on your behalf tomorrow, unless you beat me to it or unless
somebody yells. I'd rather have this not mixed up with the rest of the
build_case_label changes.
-Nathan