This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH, PR43920, 2/9] ARM specific part - test case

From: Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana dot radhakrishnan at linaro dot org>
To: Tom de Vries <vries at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 11:48:08 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH, PR43920, 2/9] ARM specific part - test case
References: <4D94C603.7080505@codesourcery.com> <4D94C787.4060207@codesourcery.com> <4D95E587.8090404@codesourcery.com> <1301672077.4104.15.camel@e102346-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <4D95F905.6010901@codesourcery.com> <4D9AF22E.7030000@codesourcery.com>

Is this updated version (
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-04/msg00058.html ) ok for trunk?

I think you accidentally applied the patch twice and committed it. Yeah unfortunately there is no equivalent of git clean -f -d in svn unless you write something up with svn status and some shell scripting foo...

I've now fixed this up with http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-04/msg00224.html

Ramana

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH, PR43920, 2/9] ARM specific part - test case
  - From: Tom de Vries

References:
- Re: [PATCH, PR43920, 2/9] ARM specific part - test case
  - From: Tom de Vries
- Re: [PATCH, PR43920, 2/9] ARM specific part - test case
  - From: Richard Earnshaw
- Re: [PATCH, PR43920, 2/9] ARM specific part - test case
  - From: Tom de Vries
- Re: [PATCH, PR43920, 2/9] ARM specific part - test case
  - From: Tom de Vries

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]