This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] cleanup gcse.c:canon_modify_mem_list


On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 05:30 -0700, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 01:22:39PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 04:44 -0700, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> > > > nit; You're missing some whitespace here (after the VEC).
> > > 
> > > This doesn't seem to be a hard-and-fast policy; all of the VEC code I
> > > remember writing or looking at recently has no spaces, and I checked the
> > > patch in on that basis.  However, running grep indicates that we have a
> > > profusion of styles...
> > 
> > I think the style guide is quite clear on this: there should be a space
> > there as Jeff says.  The fact that some code has crept in with other
> > styles doesn't make them right, or give justification for ignoring the
> > style guide.
> 
> Would you like a patch for the hundreds of instances without spaces?
> 
> Certainly vec.h never uses spaces; I thought this was simply The Way
> Things Were.
> 
> -Nathan
> 

IMO, rototils are generally pointless.  If you are fixing code nearby
then yes, fix the formatting issues.  Otherwise, just don't exacerbate
the problem, or we'll reach the point where a rototil really does become
necessary.

R.



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]