This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
- To: Rodrigo Rivas <rodrigorivascosta at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:46:15 -0500
- Subject: Re: [C++0x] Range-based for statements and ADL
- References: <AANLkTi=-PdaK2bni1d7ucHNNP2nSiDeJrnfET-ueaCvF@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikxo7955t51av28NhGt4VhA89TyFE6WNPjd_eNE@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinP2BzdG+fnO7n=5p+hvaU_VZ+-HyDLNn2Wy2J=@mail.gmail.com> <4D8A2403.5050708@redhat.com> <AANLkTimDRZ94xrA4OPziT7+X-bPK3xfAptTELFpVn-eR@mail.gmail.com> <4D90A209.2020508@redhat.com> <AANLkTintp7fzurBNiiOC+cmRoLt2CF9Q4SwSe04Y1AQa@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimWyPccxiYbYG97H9Y6ddHVHFjv+RpgM14tmNyV@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikoD0hoj36RqO163uXedvtxF1ntoageDv_Dzz3M@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=iqw486-bruSvw5PfwYsSSCKPEt=6dm75Y2sYF@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikVhCy6-sDTbu+PP0-B7sWeOH3FARGXj8RM8w-d@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:38 AM, Rodrigo Rivas
<rodrigorivascosta@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Should we consistently refer to %<for%> so the keyword is highlighted?
> Now that you say... I've not been quite consistent. We could say
> "range-based %<for%>", with only a dash between 'range' and 'based'.
>
or "new-style for loop"?