This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RX: 4.5 branch: Fix alignment and addressing issues.

From: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>
To: Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:38:10 +0000
Subject: Re: RX: 4.5 branch: Fix alignment and addressing issues.
References: <m3k4fzs2v1.fsf@redhat.com> <AANLkTikEG=Aqh-xto+1fnWpzHi1Fo5rUrJcQ4ZTL8U_9@mail.gmail.com> <4D81FF10.4060701@redhat.com> <234E5107-2C40-4C41-9BED-F22D5B53B1BB@comcast.net>

Hi Mike,

And why is that a problem? You get to write arbitrarily complex C code that can depend upon insn and operands.

Ah - I did not know this. I thought that you had to stick to RTL expressions in the definition of attributes. Thanks for letting me know otherwise.

Cheers
  Nick

References:
- RX: 4.5 branch: Fix alignment and addressing issues.
  - From: Nick Clifton
- Re: RX: 4.5 branch: Fix alignment and addressing issues.
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: RX: 4.5 branch: Fix alignment and addressing issues.
  - From: Nick Clifton
- Re: RX: 4.5 branch: Fix alignment and addressing issues.
  - From: Mike Stump

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]