This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PR 47793 - Support relative paths using -fprofile-generate
- From: Martin Thuresson <martint at google dot com>
- To: "kai dot tietz at onevision dot com" <kai dot tietz at onevision dot com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Cc: jh at suse dot cz
- Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 14:07:50 -0800
- Subject: Re: PR 47793 - Support relative paths using -fprofile-generate
- References: <AANLkTimkRXMEH5QzVpcaxNZMaK=CE-w7tAXF=1yxQxNZ@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=B8wq3uxBP3Kzk3jGw6Rn=jAjf6oAhFG_jqxj8@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinDEr9k0GGgaJHbYSjuLwcSu6gB=HKn12G0bx0z@mail.gmail.com>
Ping.
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Martin Thuresson <martint@google.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Martin Thuresson <martint@google.com> wrote:
>> Change 165596 and 168475 updated the code for handling gcda-paths. As
>> part of this change, relative paths stopped working.
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47793
>>
>> This patch adds a guard so that "/" is not added when no prefix is
>> given.
>>
>> The added testcase uses the path "../gcc/". This puts the gcda in the
>> same directory, so that the cleanup-coverage-files will find them.
>>
>> I have tested the patch using "make bootstrap; make -k check" with
>> target x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu and saw no additional test failures.
>>
>> Let me know if there is any other testing I should do.
>
> ChangeLog
> gcc/
>
> 2011-02-23 ?Martin Thuresson ?<martint@google.com>
>
> ? ? ? ?PR gcov-profile/47793
> ? ? ? ?* libgcov.c (gcov_exit): Support relative profile paths.
>
> gcc/testsuite/
>
> 2011-02-23 ?Martin Thuresson ?<martint@google.com>
>
> ? ? ? ?PR gcov-profile/47793
> ? ? ? ?* gcc.dg/pr47793.c: New.
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Martin
>>
>