This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

[trans-mem] PR46923

From: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>
To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 16:30:32 +0100
Subject: [trans-mem] PR46923

requires_barrier should really handle PARM_DECL and RESULT_DECLs, because they can escape the function just like any other variable.

The testcase in the PR isn't really valid, because volatiles aren't allowed inside transactions. It was just there to force a small reproducible testcase. Next I will work on warning if we ever try to use volatiles inside transactions.

Over-the-shoulder approval, committing, and closing the PR.

Aldy

Attachment: curr
Description: Text document

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]