This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR fortran/46794: Fix ICE with powers of integers
- From: Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu>
- To: Daniel Kraft <d at domob dot eu>
- Cc: Tobias Burnus <burnus at net-b dot de>, Fortran List <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 10:18:51 -0800
- Subject: Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR fortran/46794: Fix ICE with powers of integers
- References: <4CF97314.4000206@domob.eu> <4CFA00A1.6020101@net-b.de> <4CFA0B54.5090101@domob.eu>
On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 10:35:16AM +0100, Daniel Kraft wrote:
> Hi Tobias,
>
> Tobias Burnus wrote:
> >>Regression-tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu without failures --
> >>though the run somehow looked strange to me (on the compile-farm);
> >>I'll try again to be sure. Ok for trunk?
> >
> >OK for the trunk. Can you check whether one needs to likewise for the
> >4.5 and 4.4 branch? (I think one should check on source level - the
> >verify_tree might not always catch it. For some reasons, it ICEs here
> >with 4.4 and 4.6 but not with 4.5; however, I think that's rather by
> >chance and not because of a proper casting.)
>
> No further problems with the regtest, thanks for the review! I
> committed as rev. 167453 to trunk. I will look at the source for 4.4
> and 4.5 accordingly.
>
Can you fix the test case to be valid Fortran. k1 and k2
are used uninitialized.
--
Steve