This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
C++ PATCH for c++/46645 (libstdc++ testsuite failure)
- From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- To: gcc-patches List <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 11:19:20 -0500
- Subject: C++ PATCH for c++/46645 (libstdc++ testsuite failure)
The asserts in build_data_member_initialization were too strict; we can
see an initialization of an empty base in a copy constructor, too.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applied to trunk.
commit 70d4870d0fd8c4bc580915f16f1e94641e346a3f
Author: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Dec 1 17:43:49 2010 -0500
* semantics.c (build_data_member_initialization): Remove assert.
diff --git a/gcc/cp/semantics.c b/gcc/cp/semantics.c
index 9b565da..2424e49 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/semantics.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/semantics.c
@@ -5484,10 +5484,8 @@ build_data_member_initialization (tree t, VEC(constructor_elt,gc) **vec)
init = unshare_expr (TREE_OPERAND (t, 1));
if (TREE_CODE (member) == INDIRECT_REF)
{
- /* Don't put out anything for value-init of an empty base. */
+ /* Don't put out anything for an empty base. */
gcc_assert (is_empty_class (TREE_TYPE (member)));
- gcc_assert (TREE_CODE (init) == CONSTRUCTOR
- && CONSTRUCTOR_NELTS (init) == 0);
return true;
}
}