This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [2/9] Specs cleanup: -A, -d and -m for linker

From: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
To: Mike Stump <mikestump at comcast dot net>
Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 12:28:47 +0100
Subject: Re: [2/9] Specs cleanup: -A, -d and -m for linker
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1012021632020.26340@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1012021633380.26340@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <68B7C1B4-A2F4-441A-AECC-8BCC035387F4@comcast.net>

On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Mike Stump <mikestump@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Dec 2, 2010, at 8:33 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>> LINK_COMMAND_SPEC (including modified copies for two targets) passes
>> -A, -d and -m to the linker and has further %{!A:...} specs.
>
>> 2010-12-02 ?Joseph Myers ?<joseph@codesourcery.com>
>>
>> ? ? ? * gcc.c (LINK_COMMAND_SPEC): Don't handle -A, -d or -m.
>> ? ? ? * config/darwin.h (LINK_COMMAND_SPEC_A): Likewise.
>> ? ? ? * config/i386/djgpp.h (LINK_COMMAND_SPEC): Likewise.
>
> The darwin change is Ok, if the gcc.c change is approved (or considered obvious).

The gcc.c change is ok.

Thanks,
Richard.

References:
- [0/9] Specs cleanup: introduction
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- [2/9] Specs cleanup: -A, -d and -m for linker
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: [2/9] Specs cleanup: -A, -d and -m for linker
  - From: Mike Stump

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]