This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Add gcc-ar, gcc-nm, gcc-ranlib

From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi at firstfloor dot org>, Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Andi Kleen <ak at linux dot intel dot com>
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 09:54:24 +0100
Subject: Re: Add gcc-ar, gcc-nm, gcc-ranlib
References: <AANLkTincB7MxS4dFkbcPAVTWHJJmBXwJ-hwd3kJhK6Xp@mail.gmail.com> <4CF825E4.1080005@gnu.org> <AANLkTikaBvf_hEf0Okm6dXWwn5uWiDL4xTM3Dns=mWnb@mail.gmail.com>

On 12/03/2010 12:58 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:

Mentions of the script in the docs would need to say that they are
scripts and so they are not necessarily available on non-POSIX
platforms.  Give the amount of duplication, it would probably have
been easiest to do in C, I still believe.


We already have exec-tool.in.  I don't believe new ones make it much
worse.

exec-tool.in is not installed, these ones are.

Paolo

References:
- Add gcc-ar, gcc-nm, gcc-ranlib
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: Add gcc-ar, gcc-nm, gcc-ranlib
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: Add gcc-ar, gcc-nm, gcc-ranlib
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]