This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: more robust debug_bb?
- From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>
- To: Basile Starynkevitch <basile at starynkevitch dot net>
- Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:53:31 -0500
- Subject: Re: more robust debug_bb?
- References: <20101122154349.GA17671@ours.starynkevitch.net> <AANLkTikH8UKdmxK7T=WT8MEgMRVyRtZS-KwkQ=aqt_Gd@mail.gmail.com> <20101122182312.84b7c88c.basile@starynkevitch.net> <mcreiadxo1d.fsf@google.com> <AANLkTin1WrmQTC1tM0aOZ_toi3s8jVenTwX6m=rRPnEY@mail.gmail.com> <20101122194815.4ea4bc4a.basile@starynkevitch.net>
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 13:48, Basile Starynkevitch
<basile@starynkevitch.net> wrote:
> 2010-11-22 ÂBasile Starynkevitch Â<basile@starynkevitch.net>
> Â Â Â Â* gimple-pretty-print.c (dump_bb_header): Added check on cfun.
Blank line after date.
s/on/for/
OK with that change.
Diego.