This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, java at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 07:37:31 -0800
Subject: Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
References: <mcrocaa18nt.fsf@google.com> <AANLkTikxZ+ZBo-AWL1M5dmdJWE4G=sVxUFpYGz0y7eqh@mail.gmail.com> <4CE4F09F.7010605@codesourcery.com> <4CE4F92C.4020905@redhat.com>

On 11/18/2010 2:00 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:

> I made it pretty clear that as long as the autotesters build java, and I
> get emails when something breaks, and you have the obligation to fix
> whatever broke, I have no objection.

Great.  In contrast to Ian's statement, then, I think we *do* have a
consensus: remove Java from default languages, but do leave it in
autotesters (with consequences as above).

Thank you,

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
  - From: Diego Novillo

References:
- Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: PATCH RFA: Do not build java by default
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]