This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] target/m68k: multilib issues

From: Finn Thain <fthain at telegraphics dot com dot au>
To: Thorsten Glaser <tg at mirbsd dot de>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 10:45:24 +1100 (EST)
Subject: Re: [RFC] target/m68k: multilib issues
References: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1011180049460.1202@localhost> <Pine.BSM.4.64L.1011172259200.29606@herc.mirbsd.org>

On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Thorsten Glaser wrote:

> Finn Thain dixit:
> 
> >Presently m68k-linux libgfortran fails to build, because of the cpu32
> 
> Since cpu32 is for uClinux

I believe it is supported by newlib.

> mostly, from what I heard, I dropped its multilib in Debian. We have 
> only standard, 68040 and 68060 there at the moment.

Most likely debian will always need to adjust mulitlibs. Which is probably 
why they are happy with your patch. I'm not really doing this for debian.

> 
> Does it make sense to have it at all, even though someone apparently
> ported glibc to it?

Dropping cpu32 from m68k-linux doesn't solve the gfortran problem for 
uclinux.

Finn

> 
> bye,
> //mirabilos
>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] target/m68k: multilib issues
  - From: Thorsten Glaser

References:
- [RFC] target/m68k: multilib issues
  - From: Finn Thain
- Re: [RFC] target/m68k: multilib issues
  - From: Thorsten Glaser

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]