This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH,lto] Fix PR42690 and related LTO-vs-static-linking issues.
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 16:33:04 +0000 (UTC)
- Subject: Re: [PATCH,lto] Fix PR42690 and related LTO-vs-static-linking issues.
- References: <4CE2B477.4040209@gmail.com> <AANLkTi=eWkt78N8KwYq1_d2dkzzVfLPu3nBXrye1WX2t@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Richard Guenther wrote:
> Are we sure that all -l options are joined ones? The driver accepts
> -l m just fine.
The driver converts -l options to joined form when passing them to
add_infile. I don't know about the -l options contained directly in
specs; that's what would need checking. (Specs other than those in
driver_self_specs do not go through the option processing machinery; they
are generating command lines for programs other than the driver.)
> I'm ok with the patch if Joseph thinks it is ok.
I have no comments on this patch.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com